Bug#1053935: www.debian.org: outdated debian-cd, debian-archive, debian-ports mirror lists

"Adam D. Barratt" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID <7a5264f98902ee1bf94291c11f34e5040a56cb1b.camel__10980.9864124813$1697824297$gmane$org@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Sun, 2023-10-15 at 00:14 +0900, Jing Luo wrote:
> The debian-cd [1][2], debian-archive [3], debian-ports [4] mirror
> lists are 
> outdated. They do not reflect Mirrors.masterlist.in [5].
> Related bug report: #1034832
> 
[...]
> [1] https://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/
> [2] https://www.debian.org/CD/mirroring/rsync-mirrors
> [3] https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive
> [4] https://www.ports.debian.org/mirrors
> [5] 
> https://salsa.debian.org/mirror-team/masterlist/-/blob/master/Mirrors.masterlist.in
> 

Note that Mirrors.masterlist.in is not used verbatim by any part of the
website. Rather, the Mirror Team's status monitoring tools (see e.g. 
https://mirror-master.debian.org/status/mirror-status.html ) generate a
filtered list containing those mirrors which are considered to be
currently "good enough" (i.e. have managed to stay up-to-date for long
enough), so not all mirrors in the .in file will appear in the results.

I haven't checked the ports list, but the debian-cd and debian-archive
lists being published on the web pages certainly appear to match those
included in the generated version of Mirrors.masterlist.

Can you point to specific examples that you believe should be included
in each, but are not?

Regards,

Adam
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.