Re: Proposal: Refresh list of category in https://lists.debian.org/

On 30.03.24 11:53, Kentaro Hayashi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> It seems that some of category in lists.debian.org
> may be too comprehensive,
> so I think that revisit updating list of category may be better.
> 
> I've filed as a bug [1] especially the following 2 cases.
> 
> * Case 1) "Users" category is too comprehensive, let's split it.
> * Case 2) "Developers" category is too comprehensive, let's split it.
> 
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1065647
> 
> Case 1) "Users" category is too comprehensive, let's split it.
> 
> Split Users into "Users" and "Local Community and Users".
> Merit of this one is making it easy to distinct local/regional community.
> 
>   Before:
> 
>     * Users (English)
>      * debian-announce
>      * debian-backports
>      ...
>      * debian-user
>      ...
>      * debian-chinese
>      * debian-chinese-big5
>      * debian-chinese-gb
>      * debian-esperanto
>      ...
> 
> 
>    After:
> 
>     * Users (English)
>      * debian-announce
>      * debian-backports
>      ...
>      * debian-user
>      ...
> 
>     * Local Community and Users
> 
>      * debian-chinese
>      * debian-chinese-big5
>      * debian-chinese-gb
>      * debian-esperanto
>      * debian-french
>      * debian-italian
>      * debian-japanese
>      * debian-user-catalan
>      * debian-user-danish
>      ...
> 
> Case 2) Developers category is too comprehensive, let's split it.
> 
> Extract some mailing-list into new "Maintenance of Programming
> Languages" from Developers category.
> 
>    Before:
> 
>     * Developers
> 
>      * debian-academy
>      ...
> 
>    After:
> 
>     * Developers
> 
>      * debian-academy
>      ...
> 
>     * Maintenance of Programming Languages
> 
>      * debian-ada
>      * debian-clojure
>      * debian-common-lisp
>      * debian-go
>      * debian-haskell
>      * debian-js
>      * debian-ocaml-maint
>      * debian-perl
>      * debian-python
>      * debian-r
>      * debian-ruby
>      * debian-rust
>      * debian-scheme
> 
> Any thought?

+1
*t