Bug#877337: single-page html of debian-policy to be revived?

Holger Levsen <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:59:54 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID	<Zhz6mp74c4Qkr_l8__5561.89758224122$1713175417$gmane$org@layer-acht.org>

On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 08:43:51PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> ... but if dev-ref is already shipping both, maybe singlepage is indeed
> usable these days ...

I think it is.

> > Could the Policy Editors team check, if everything is fine now, and if
> > this should be published again?
> > At least there is still an issue with the footnotes, there are 16 occurrences
> > of #id1 for example... (search for "[1]" in policy-1.html).
> Hrm.  That seems like a pretty serious problem :\

I wouldnt call it serious. annoying yes, maybe.

> Holger L., did you know about this issue?
> Did you decide it was worth publishing anyway?

yes.

https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#how-could-installing-a-package-into-testing-possibly-break-other-packages
or (single page) https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/developers-reference.en.html#how-could-installing-a-package-into-testing-possibly-break-other-packages
both show four footnotes, right where they belong, it's just that
each foot note is numbered and that [1] or [2] or whatever is
a link, pointing to a wrong place.

I agree it's a bug, but I do think it's a pretty harmless one.

-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

"Any fool can know. The point is to understand." - A. Einstein

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)