Bug#877337: single-page html of debian-policy to be revived?

Sean Whitton <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:15:19 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID	<87bk5v2ml4.fsf__8627.7299023763$1714209547$gmane$org@zephyr.silentflame.com>

Hello,

On Mon 15 Apr 2024 at 09:59am GMT, Holger Levsen wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 08:43:51PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> ... but if dev-ref is already shipping both, maybe singlepage is indeed
>> usable these days ...
>
> I think it is.
>
>> > Could the Policy Editors team check, if everything is fine now, and if
>> > this should be published again?
>> > At least there is still an issue with the footnotes, there are 16 occurrences
>> > of #id1 for example... (search for "[1]" in policy-1.html).
>> Hrm.  That seems like a pretty serious problem :\
>
> I wouldnt call it serious. annoying yes, maybe.
>
>> Holger L., did you know about this issue?
>> Did you decide it was worth publishing anyway?
>
> yes.
>
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#how-could-installing-a-package-into-testing-possibly-break-other-packages
> or (single page)
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/developers-reference.en.html#how-could-installing-a-package-into-testing-possibly-break-other-packages
> both show four footnotes, right where they belong, it's just that
> each foot note is numbered and that [1] or [2] or whatever is
> a link, pointing to a wrong place.
>
> I agree it's a bug, but I do think it's a pretty harmless one.

Thanks.  I'd be grateful for some feedback from other regular Policy
contributors.

-- 
Sean Whitton

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 869 B)