Re: Proposal: Refresh list of category in https://lists.debian.org/

Hi,

I've proposed refresh list of category in
https://lists.debian.org before. [1]
There is a few feedbacks, but they are not negative ones.
[2][3]

So I want to make this idea forward, but not familiar way
to do it.

First, to raise an attention to the team, I've filed as a bug
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065647

Then I've seen https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ListMaster, so
I've tried to contact the team directly.

As far as I know, content of repository is not public so
the only way to do is asking the team members to update ones, doesn't it?

[1]
Proposal: Refresh list of category in https://lists.debian.org/
https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2024/03/msg00046.html

[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2024/03/msg00048.html
[3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2024/04/msg00001.html

Regards,

2024年3月30日(土) 19:53 Kentaro Hayashi <[email protected]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that some of category in lists.debian.org
> may be too comprehensive,
> so I think that revisit updating list of category may be better.
>
> I've filed as a bug [1] especially the following 2 cases.
>
> * Case 1) "Users" category is too comprehensive, let's split it.
> * Case 2) "Developers" category is too comprehensive, let's split it.
>
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1065647
>
> Case 1) "Users" category is too comprehensive, let's split it.
>
> Split Users into "Users" and "Local Community and Users".
> Merit of this one is making it easy to distinct local/regional community.
>
>  Before:
>
>    * Users (English)
>     * debian-announce
>     * debian-backports
>     ...
>     * debian-user
>     ...
>     * debian-chinese
>     * debian-chinese-big5
>     * debian-chinese-gb
>     * debian-esperanto
>     ...
>
>
>   After:
>
>    * Users (English)
>     * debian-announce
>     * debian-backports
>     ...
>     * debian-user
>     ...
>
>    * Local Community and Users
>
>     * debian-chinese
>     * debian-chinese-big5
>     * debian-chinese-gb
>     * debian-esperanto
>     * debian-french
>     * debian-italian
>     * debian-japanese
>     * debian-user-catalan
>     * debian-user-danish
>     ...
>
> Case 2) Developers category is too comprehensive, let's split it.
>
> Extract some mailing-list into new "Maintenance of Programming
> Languages" from Developers category.
>
>   Before:
>
>    * Developers
>
>     * debian-academy
>     ...
>
>   After:
>
>    * Developers
>
>     * debian-academy
>     ...
>
>    * Maintenance of Programming Languages
>
>     * debian-ada
>     * debian-clojure
>     * debian-common-lisp
>     * debian-go
>     * debian-haskell
>     * debian-js
>     * debian-ocaml-maint
>     * debian-perl
>     * debian-python
>     * debian-r
>     * debian-ruby
>     * debian-rust
>     * debian-scheme
>
> Any thought?
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> --
> Kentaro Hayashi <[email protected]>



-- 
Kentaro Hayashi <[email protected]>