Re: preparing the upgrade of www-master to bookworm: issues building the bullseye release notes (fonts-sil-charis)
Paul Gevers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.documentation,gmane.linux.debian.devel.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On 29-09-2024 14:40, Thomas Lange wrote: > I would be happy if you could decide what you want to do. Keep the PDF > versions (with or without updating them) or remove building the PDFs? > Currently this discussion seems to be stalled and I like to move forward. > How likes to decide this? debian-doc or release team? > > IMO the release notes for an oldstable release are not that important > to postpone the upgrade of a Debian machine. With my Release Team member hat on, I propose to at least stop building once a release is no longer supported by the Release Team / Security Team. I don't have a strong opinion on keeping the notes for historical purposes, but I don't think we've done that so far. Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 495 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAmb5sHMFAwAAAAAACgkQnFyZ6wW9dQqs owf/dXBFGlcYvi01NQ+elI8+40IZ7OipKHikEnkjDavMlUItAFOmIkEGutdDq8DgQAk6P8EEE+jn WICI8JnfVeLH1d2GhlcnzFPC7mT6G/CtUJTEor2qPFkYkg/v4HSa5jKFtc7D8FR4JK+7NAMpBfsd GLwawkR3rt6qwgsp1rEyNw4dCGsgUF7FyxnkXygNc9Tjk+/mRjZ/ZijjfW4WVUelMOm/KDU4611l D7Dwil8yK9bAP7pPa+cBH7kxzao25IrN/usMVMa32RbAfeDq2zSWazZqKZi1yCD/h/1aUls36t1s xFwG5aHdk6iEJpTGENYDxGgaFzil9psd2nnYpPTUSA== =ZF1H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----