Re: loong64 was not included in https://packages.debian.org/ page

Boyuan Yang <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:24:14 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Organization	Debian Project
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

在 2025-02-24一的 17:01 +0800，zhangdandan写道：
> Hi,
> 
> I am glad to receive your reply.
> Thanks for your help and submission.
> 
> 在 2025/2/23 下午11:51, Holger Wansing 写道:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > zhangdandan <[email protected]> wrote (Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:23:06 +0800):
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I checked that loong64 was not included in https://packages.debian.org/
> > > page.
> > > For examples,
> > > - dpkg
> > > dpkg was built for loong64 in the Debian Package Auto-Building
> > > environment, please view
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dpkg&suite=sid.
> > > But loong64 was not included in the end of the page
> > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/dpkg.
> > > 
> > > - apt and more packages in sid (unstable)
> > > apt was built for loong64 in the Debian Package Auto-Building
> > > environment, please view
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apt&suite=sid.
> > > But loong64 was not included in the end of the page
> > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/apt.
> > > 
> > > Please help to add loong64 in https://packages.debian.org/ page.
> > I have created a merge request for this:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/merge_requests/36
> 
> Could maintainer help to review and merge the MR of loong64 support?

I merged https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/merge_requests/35 ,
but keep in mind that I do not have permission to touch any deployed packages.d.o instance.
I still don't know who is in charge of code deployment. This is problematic.

Thanks,
Boyuan Yang

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 858 B)