Re: Wiki: Remove some outdated pages?

Why not just update the outdated pages with new ones...i know it will take
some time but that should solve the issue

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025, 20:24 Donald Norwood <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On 3/24/25 09:01, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 01:51:31PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:39:10 +0000, Steve McIntyre <
> [email protected]> said:
> >>
> >>    > Why remove documentation on what has been considered and done in
> the
> >>    > web team? What harm are those pages causing?
> >> To improve the ratio between good and outdated content.
> >
> > Just because content is not super-fresh, that does not make it
> > *bad*. What happens when people start planning another project and
> > look for documentation about what was considered and what happened
> > last time, for example?
> >
> > This is *not* user-facing documentation, this is documentation about
> > what has been worked on inside the web team. By all means move/rename
> > it under the team's area in the wiki, but *don't* just remove it
> > because it's old.
> >
> > Deletion of history *for the sake of it* is not helpful.
> >
>
> Both of you make valid points, perhaps we come up with another option to
> add a header stating the article/documentation is no longer relevant
> pointing to a new link as is practice elsewhere, or we come up with an
> 'archived' flag which could equally show the page is not longer relevant.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Be well,
>
> -Donald
>
> --
> -
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05
>
>