Bug#1109609: Removing old news from webpages
Thomas Lange <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <26769.49397.664330.491787__34870.1981174358$1754382689$gmane$org@cs.uni-koeln.de> |
>>>>> On Fri, 01 Aug 2025 16:19:25 +0100, "Jonathan Dowland" <[email protected]> said: > There's nothing preventing us from replacing the list with a > RewriteCond, it just needs someone to do the work. I could do it, but > there are other Chronicles-related stuff I need to fix first. Hi Jonathan, I would be happy if you can do this in the future, but there's no need to hurry. > However, the solution I've gone for suffers from the problem I was > trying to avoid (www delegating too much responsibility for what is a > valid www URI to the Chronicles service), so a RewriteCond would be no > worse from that perspective. Mea culpa, I did this in an incredible > rush. No problem. There's not that much traffic to the old URLs (and maybe no traffic to URLs that never exists), so you've tried to avoid a problem that does not matter in reality. > The list doesn't need changing at all unless you delete more content. I > hope you aren't planning to do that, and certainly not on a regular > basis! I plan to only keep the last 3 years, so at some point in time (may end of this year) another folder will be deleted. > When you do wish to delete stuff, please don't automatically assume we > will pick it up. It should be a conversation and agreement between the > two services. I'll keep you informed, so you will have enough time to prepare for it. > Re-reading [2] you did suggest that the webteam could review the MR, but > I didn't interpret that as "must" (and later forgot about it entirely). > I iterated on the changes with DSA a few times and that never came up. I > apologise, and will ensure to run all future www-related changes via the > webteam. It was not a must, so no big issue here. Currently we have a solution that you are happy with and works for me too, and if you improve the rewrite rules in the future, that would be perfect.