Re: Terminology changes for update-alternatives
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> Sun, 29 Jan 2023 08:30:15 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.internationalization.english,gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Eyrie |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Justin B Rye <[email protected]> writes: > if "primary/secondary" is no good there are variants like "major/minor", > but I think the one I'd have expected to be a front-runner is "main > link" and "subsidiary link", with the latter abbreviating to "Sublinks:" > and "--sub". leader/follower is the other option that came to my mind, and that I think captures the nature of the secondary links (that they follow the configuration of the primary link). That's what I think tow is trying to get at (and I agree that tow reads oddly in English, as a word that I wouldn't expect to see in a technical context and for which the analogy is not immediately obvious).