Re: review of src:sequoia-chameleon-gnupg package descriptions

Holger Levsen <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:01:10 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.internationalization.english
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--MKdF0eAiGKcvZFaZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Justin,

On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 05:10:02PM +0000, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Okay!  Suggested version attached.

<3 thank you very much for that lovely & caring review! I love all your
changes and will upload shortly! =F0=9F=A4=97
 =20
> > Description: Sequoia's reimplementation of the GnuPG cli tools (metapac=
kage)
> An initialism, so definitely capitalised.
>=20
> It's a bit long; maybe the "reimplementation" part can wait for the
> long description:
>   Description: Sequoia's GnuPG CLI tools (metapackage)

agreed.
=20
> Fair enough, this all looks intelligible.  I'll deal with the quoted
> descriptions below, but notice that one of them is a "what it is" noun
> phrase while the other is a "what it's for" verb phrase - the list
> would read a bit more smoothly if they were syntactically parallel.

I knew you would find these inconsistancies.. thank you.
 =20
[...]=20
> But this is essentially repeating the previous paragraph, while
> slightly contradicting it.  Couldn't we merge the two paragraphs as
> something like
>=20
>  gpg-sq is Sequoia's alternative implementation of a tool following
>  the GnuPG command line interface. It provides a drop-in but not
>  feature-complete.replacement for the GnuPG project's gpg.

YES.

[...]=20
> The previous two descriptions both talked about themselves as packages
> when it would make things simpler to keep the focus on the utilities
> they contained; this one does some administrative hocus-pocus, so if
> anything it would make *more* sense for it to start with "this
> package" (and an active verb).

:)) thank you, again. I knew it needed someone to look from the distance
to have this perspective and be able to express it / point out whats
wrong with the previous version.

> (g10code?  Oh, okay, "=C9=A110=E1=B6=9C=E1=B5=92=E1=B5=88=E1=B5=89 GMBH".)

well spotted! :)


*thank you*, ***again!***


--=20
cheers,
	Holger

 =E2=A2=80=E2=A3=B4=E2=A0=BE=E2=A0=BB=E2=A2=B6=E2=A3=A6=E2=A0=80
 =E2=A3=BE=E2=A0=81=E2=A2=A0=E2=A0=92=E2=A0=80=E2=A3=BF=E2=A1=81  holger@(d=
ebian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 =E2=A2=BF=E2=A1=84=E2=A0=98=E2=A0=B7=E2=A0=9A=E2=A0=8B=E2=A0=80  OpenPGP: =
B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 =E2=A0=88=E2=A0=B3=E2=A3=84

Make racists afraid again.

--MKdF0eAiGKcvZFaZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmYEs0YACgkQCRq4Vgaa
qhxZ/A//W55VMlBDpTZHUk54K5VW/kH25q0Gh784Qs8lvJO847CjTnTOos6glsD+
qOkcvs87Zfx4Uk0UuD3VqMQXV04G8TTwvCObRjtDuOPg2dMak8sfPbDx71W6XtfU
+QdSXTxenHXkpbL5Ivng6uemdCJNPcWGrhHwSszAGFlWouZ/E8iitEtR8bLGZvLu
7pI1MhfKcQGisNjDxvM+BowVjBr+AL8myNK4+iCfaA6fB0PtbryGYxxjpwmf9rBl
Pyp+fUOvAlRQTiLoFbSfglw74l7r3viJOfhgZesutJsWQioCEOuTN5PfCX0DidSp
CpBBp929Hu1IAIT5YE7tCWxXEBnvYcROr4uWRSujnmKk5jCjwbTzstJyJL71XRc/
kcqSx8m10718mDqkQr4XWrRQlW/6tfkrlVGxfoXm6Jt9nPO3hisuHp6Miab6LeHL
E+ANdBGjmWXySZf+HWVmcAiHJxdajo2QwxqMGzVqW6/ymFYC0V/nmf+k0oW3U66i
gdXEEYXkpLk+mljNrCSZbP1iX824xcjPdc+VS1I67NvnixeejJDo4YBeOXq+L9ec
Q2rdTWC574iEjAfsFbJ6+lhe81acptAcnfGJioTu01Et3ZiV7sJ208a3sY44rynl
mMwge/juTMY51qBJDrwmeTVzNx27ck1OT/DaIIylyYgKQ5kcIc4=
=BKv4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--MKdF0eAiGKcvZFaZ--