Re: review of src:sequoia-chameleon-gnupg package descriptions
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:01:10 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.internationalization.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--MKdF0eAiGKcvZFaZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Justin, On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 05:10:02PM +0000, Justin B Rye wrote: > Okay! Suggested version attached. <3 thank you very much for that lovely & caring review! I love all your changes and will upload shortly! =F0=9F=A4=97 =20 > > Description: Sequoia's reimplementation of the GnuPG cli tools (metapac= kage) > An initialism, so definitely capitalised. >=20 > It's a bit long; maybe the "reimplementation" part can wait for the > long description: > Description: Sequoia's GnuPG CLI tools (metapackage) agreed. =20 > Fair enough, this all looks intelligible. I'll deal with the quoted > descriptions below, but notice that one of them is a "what it is" noun > phrase while the other is a "what it's for" verb phrase - the list > would read a bit more smoothly if they were syntactically parallel. I knew you would find these inconsistancies.. thank you. =20 [...]=20 > But this is essentially repeating the previous paragraph, while > slightly contradicting it. Couldn't we merge the two paragraphs as > something like >=20 > gpg-sq is Sequoia's alternative implementation of a tool following > the GnuPG command line interface. It provides a drop-in but not > feature-complete.replacement for the GnuPG project's gpg. YES. [...]=20 > The previous two descriptions both talked about themselves as packages > when it would make things simpler to keep the focus on the utilities > they contained; this one does some administrative hocus-pocus, so if > anything it would make *more* sense for it to start with "this > package" (and an active verb). :)) thank you, again. I knew it needed someone to look from the distance to have this perspective and be able to express it / point out whats wrong with the previous version. > (g10code? Oh, okay, "=C9=A110=E1=B6=9C=E1=B5=92=E1=B5=88=E1=B5=89 GMBH".) well spotted! :) *thank you*, ***again!*** --=20 cheers, Holger =E2=A2=80=E2=A3=B4=E2=A0=BE=E2=A0=BB=E2=A2=B6=E2=A3=A6=E2=A0=80 =E2=A3=BE=E2=A0=81=E2=A2=A0=E2=A0=92=E2=A0=80=E2=A3=BF=E2=A1=81 holger@(d= ebian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org =E2=A2=BF=E2=A1=84=E2=A0=98=E2=A0=B7=E2=A0=9A=E2=A0=8B=E2=A0=80 OpenPGP: = B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C =E2=A0=88=E2=A0=B3=E2=A3=84 Make racists afraid again. --MKdF0eAiGKcvZFaZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmYEs0YACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhxZ/A//W55VMlBDpTZHUk54K5VW/kH25q0Gh784Qs8lvJO847CjTnTOos6glsD+ qOkcvs87Zfx4Uk0UuD3VqMQXV04G8TTwvCObRjtDuOPg2dMak8sfPbDx71W6XtfU +QdSXTxenHXkpbL5Ivng6uemdCJNPcWGrhHwSszAGFlWouZ/E8iitEtR8bLGZvLu 7pI1MhfKcQGisNjDxvM+BowVjBr+AL8myNK4+iCfaA6fB0PtbryGYxxjpwmf9rBl Pyp+fUOvAlRQTiLoFbSfglw74l7r3viJOfhgZesutJsWQioCEOuTN5PfCX0DidSp CpBBp929Hu1IAIT5YE7tCWxXEBnvYcROr4uWRSujnmKk5jCjwbTzstJyJL71XRc/ kcqSx8m10718mDqkQr4XWrRQlW/6tfkrlVGxfoXm6Jt9nPO3hisuHp6Miab6LeHL E+ANdBGjmWXySZf+HWVmcAiHJxdajo2QwxqMGzVqW6/ymFYC0V/nmf+k0oW3U66i gdXEEYXkpLk+mljNrCSZbP1iX824xcjPdc+VS1I67NvnixeejJDo4YBeOXq+L9ec Q2rdTWC574iEjAfsFbJ6+lhe81acptAcnfGJioTu01Et3ZiV7sJ208a3sY44rynl mMwge/juTMY51qBJDrwmeTVzNx27ck1OT/DaIIylyYgKQ5kcIc4= =BKv4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MKdF0eAiGKcvZFaZ--