Re: Translation status robot (again?)

Helge Kreutzmann <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Jul 2024 13:15:03 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.www,gmane.linux.debian.internationalization.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hello Holger and all,
Am Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 11:51:34PM +0200 schrieb Holger Wansing:
> And finally:
> The page
> https://i18n.debian.org/nmu-radar/nmu_bypackage.html
> is currently pointless, since there is noone doing such NMU uploads for
> l10n updates (that was bubulle's part, who is no longer active in Debian).
> So people should not care about this page.

As stated earlier, I do care (a lot) about this page and I do i18n
NMUs when we are closing towards a release. I already state this
earlier on this list.

I totally agree, that I'm doing much less in this regard than bubulle,
yes, so additional people working on this are more than welcome to do
so.

> Maybe we should remove it? Or place a big fat warning about its status?

It would be great if this page could be kept, because it guides me
(amongst others) in my NMU decisions.

> It's annoying, if different pages (with totally different approaches) are 
> compared against, and the differences lead to such complains.

IIRC this page was unknown to several contributors on this list until
I recently mentioned it. So I doubt that this single page is the
source of confusion.

And thanks for keeping the infrastructure up and running, despite all
these difficulties (strange tool chain, script written by others,
broken po(t) files and difficult handling by other Debian
contributors).

Greetings

             Helge

-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     [email protected]
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)