Re: Sobre la retirada de la receta
"Jaime E. Villate" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.internationalization.laespiral |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 10:47:17PM +0000, Paco wrote: > El autor del proyecto tiene todo el derecho del mundo a hacer lo que > le de la gana en su servidor. Eso no se lo puede quitar nadie y no se- > ré yo quien le diga lo que tiene que hacer. > Pero por favor, que no diga que esta emulando el espiritu de Debian en > la Espiral por que eso no es asÃ. Aqui se está hablando de documentación > y no de codigo fuente. Los paquetes tienen en Debian una estructura > jerarquizada segun sus reglas, de acuerdo, pero es absurdo meter la > documentación en el mismo saco. Los que escriben la documentación son > los que deciden si sus documentos son libres, no su contenido. Te aconsejo leer las discusiones sobre documentación que han habido este año en la lista debian-legal. Por ejemplo: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200203/msg00129.html From: Branden Robinson <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:31:47 -0500 On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 02:10:17PM -0800, C.M. Connelly wrote: > Exactly. So the question is, does the DFSG really apply to > documentation or not? Of course it does. Read the Debian Social Contract. 1. Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software We promise to keep the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution entirely free software. As there are many definitions of free software, we include the guidelines we use to determine if software is "free" below. We will support our users who develop and run non-free software on Debian, but we will never make the system depend on an item of non-free software. The Debian Distribution is entirely, 100% Free Software. If it's software, it must be Free to be part of the Distribution. We can treat all kinds of things as "software" for the purposes of our social contract (documentation, images, sound files, sample core dumps from a PDP-11 -- whatever). In doing so, however, this non-software must meet the same critera as software -- that is, it must be Free -- or it cannot be part of our distribution. That's the current status. To change it will require a General Resolution. People are way too hung up on this "documentation" issue. Somehow people have the notion that its more legitimate for copyright holders to withhold the freedoms that we insist upon when we're talking about something that isn't software in the strictest sense. In that case, I invite you to purge from your Debian/GNU system *EVERYTHING* that is not software according to definition you think we should be applying. Then get back to me and tell me how useful the system is. I imaging that people who are accustomed to the GNOME or KDE desktop environments, or even manual pages, with find their experience compromised. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]