Re: muesli's repository strategy + packages are getting updated

Heine Salte <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:58:00 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.kde.cvs
Organization DragonStar Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 04 February 2004 02:08, Christian Muehlhaeuser wrote:
> hey guys!
- ---snip snip---
> users got plenty of options now:
>
> 1. always use the already-approved KDE_DEV_RELEASE which should be a nice
> compromise between stability and new features.
>
> 2. a mixture between KDE_DEV_RELEASE and KDE_CVS_HEAD with manually
> selected packages.
>
> 3. developing, feature preview and bug-fixing with KDE_CVS_HEAD.
>
> 4. if everything fails, get back to KDE_STABLE.
>
> let me know what you think about it...
well, sounds good, except for the KDE_STABLE part. if they're identical to the 
official debs, what's the point of you wasting time and effort on making 
them? or space hosting them? and what about versioning? would they clash with 
the official debs, or outrank them?

don't take this the wrong way though, I love your work dude :)
>
> muesli
> http://blog.chris.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> debian-kde-cvs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://opendoorsoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/debian-kde-cvs

- -- 
================================
Heine Salte
[email protected]
================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAIKYIucdk4hBvNDYRAj3CAJ0Qtpcp5xjTePXrt+7hUb+40wwvvQCgrzQ1
hhtUtf1ejMZE50MsKbrUKXg=
=gO86
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----