Re: muesli's repository strategy + packages are getting updated

Domenico Maria Giffone <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:42:08 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.kde.cvs
Organization Blue Financial Communication S.r.l.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I totally agree with your opinion Martin.
Thanks a lot for muesli effort

-- 
Domenico Maria Giffone
Blue Financial Communication srl
Via Melchiorre Gioia,55 - 20124 - Milano - Italia
Tel.   +39 02.303.211.25
Fax    +39 02.303.211.00


Alle 12:29, mercoledì 4 febbraio 2004, Martin Atukunda ha scritto:

> On Wednesday 04 February 2004 04:08, Christian Muehlhaeuser wrote:
> > KDE_CVS_HEAD: latest avail. cvs packages from the head branch. pretty
> > much what you used to get from orth's repository. THIS IS INTENDED FOR
> > DEVELOPERS / HARDCORE USERS in the future.
> >
> > KDE_DEV_RELEASE: latest released development version. this would be stuff
> > like "rc1", "beta2". in times with less officially tagged releases, we
> > will declare our own package sets as dev_releases, if we trust them and
> > they feel stable enough. these package sets will come straight out of the
> > KDE_CVS_HEAD repository. THIS IS INTENDED TO BE THE NEW SOURCE FOR
> > "NORMAL" USERS in the future.
> >
> > KDE_STABLE: this will be the first repository, which i will set up after
> > the current compile process (mentioned at top of mail) is complete. it is
> > kind of redundant, since this package set will be equal to the official
> > debian set. but since i'll provide the newest stable release way before
> > debian, it is there and will stay there... till the next release.
>
> fantastic, though maintaining a KDE_STABLE would seem like duplication of
> effort. I can agree with it's being available at the beginning for
> completeness sake.
>
> But i would think that KDE_STABLE stable be dropped when the other branches
> are opened and functional.
>
> my 2c
>
> - Martin -