Re: muesli's repository strategy + packages are getting updated
Domenico Maria Giffone <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:42:08 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.kde.cvs |
|---|---|
| Organization | Blue Financial Communication S.r.l. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I totally agree with your opinion Martin. Thanks a lot for muesli effort -- Domenico Maria Giffone Blue Financial Communication srl Via Melchiorre Gioia,55 - 20124 - Milano - Italia Tel. +39 02.303.211.25 Fax +39 02.303.211.00 Alle 12:29, mercoledì 4 febbraio 2004, Martin Atukunda ha scritto: > On Wednesday 04 February 2004 04:08, Christian Muehlhaeuser wrote: > > KDE_CVS_HEAD: latest avail. cvs packages from the head branch. pretty > > much what you used to get from orth's repository. THIS IS INTENDED FOR > > DEVELOPERS / HARDCORE USERS in the future. > > > > KDE_DEV_RELEASE: latest released development version. this would be stuff > > like "rc1", "beta2". in times with less officially tagged releases, we > > will declare our own package sets as dev_releases, if we trust them and > > they feel stable enough. these package sets will come straight out of the > > KDE_CVS_HEAD repository. THIS IS INTENDED TO BE THE NEW SOURCE FOR > > "NORMAL" USERS in the future. > > > > KDE_STABLE: this will be the first repository, which i will set up after > > the current compile process (mentioned at top of mail) is complete. it is > > kind of redundant, since this package set will be equal to the official > > debian set. but since i'll provide the newest stable release way before > > debian, it is there and will stay there... till the next release. > > fantastic, though maintaining a KDE_STABLE would seem like duplication of > effort. I can agree with it's being available at the beginning for > completeness sake. > > But i would think that KDE_STABLE stable be dropped when the other branches > are opened and functional. > > my 2c > > - Martin -