Re: muesli's repository strategy + packages are getting updated
Christian Muehlhaeuser <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:34:19 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.kde.cvs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 08:58, Heine Salte wrote: > well, sounds good, except for the KDE_STABLE part. if they're identical to > the official debs, what's the point of you wasting time and effort on > making them? or space hosting them? and what about versioning? would they > clash with the official debs, or outrank them? > > don't take this the wrong way though, I love your work dude :) hehe, thanks first. well, here are my reasons: 1. if the harddisk is big enough, there is just no need for removing kde_stable. rob: is there enough harddisk space? :-) i'll prolly need 1.2gb, totally. 2. it's great for temporary-downgrading. it got pretty much the same package structure as the newer releases, so a downgrade is really at your fingertips. and even the KDE_DEV_RELEASES could break once in a while. (e.g. kmail tends to... i hate it if i can't read my mail with kmail) regards, muesli