Re: Re: e100 vs eepro100

Klaus Knopper <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.knoppix
Organization LinuxTag e.V.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 09:18:01PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Marc Haber <[email protected]> wrote:
> > However, I have never seen an eepro100 chip that was not supported by
> > e100. That includes numerous on-board ethernet interfaces.
> 
> Yes, my EtherJet100 also gets detected by e100 (at least
> it grabs it), but this card has the same PCI ID as my
> original Intel-cards have. So it seems, the driver does
> not check the Board IDs at least.
> However, there are PCI IDs in eepro100 that are not in
> e100 and vice versa.

Well, I'm trying to resolve this by looking at the sources. For those
PCI ids which are present in both drivers, I will use the e100 module
for now unless someone reports problems.

What about cards that have PCI vendor ids not starting with 0x8086,
like this one:
0x10c3 0x1100 "Samsung Semiconductors, Inc.|Smartether100 SC1100 LAN Adapter (i82557B)"
?

Such an ID is not listed in any of the two drivers id_table[]. I'm
using eepro100 for those cards for now.

Regards
-Klaus Knopper
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.