Re: Re: e100 vs eepro100
Klaus Knopper <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.knoppix |
|---|---|
| Organization | LinuxTag e.V. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 09:18:01PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > Marc Haber <[email protected]> wrote: > > However, I have never seen an eepro100 chip that was not supported by > > e100. That includes numerous on-board ethernet interfaces. > > Yes, my EtherJet100 also gets detected by e100 (at least > it grabs it), but this card has the same PCI ID as my > original Intel-cards have. So it seems, the driver does > not check the Board IDs at least. > However, there are PCI IDs in eepro100 that are not in > e100 and vice versa. Well, I'm trying to resolve this by looking at the sources. For those PCI ids which are present in both drivers, I will use the e100 module for now unless someone reports problems. What about cards that have PCI vendor ids not starting with 0x8086, like this one: 0x10c3 0x1100 "Samsung Semiconductors, Inc.|Smartether100 SC1100 LAN Adapter (i82557B)" ? Such an ID is not listed in any of the two drivers id_table[]. I'm using eepro100 for those cards for now. Regards -Klaus Knopper