Re: Kernel versions 6.x don't boot on Amiga 4000

Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.m68k,gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k
Message-ID <Y/[email protected]>
Hi Geert,

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 01:31:23PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:34 PM Mike Rapoport <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:42:34PM +1300, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Am 27.02.2023 um 21:26 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > > > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > > > I wonder whether Finn's memtest patch merely exposed another MM bug
> > > > >
> > > > > A kernel patch may be easier than a bootloader patch (even if this is a
> > > > > bootloader bug) particularly if it affects multiple platforms.
> > > > >
> > > > > A partial revert of my patch (below) will probably avoid the issue, but
> > > > > with the side effect that use of memtest will clobber the initrd.
> > > >
> > > > Which we can avoid, by moving the ramdisk handling inside paging_init().
> > > >
> > > > > The initrd and memtest features aren't usually needed together. At the
> > > > > time when I needed the memtest feature I did not have confidence in the
> > > > > hardeare. An initrd wasn't very useful at that point.
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c
> > > > > index 3a2bb2e8fdad..92f1b9268dff 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c
> > > > > @@ -326,6 +326,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> > > > >                 panic("No configuration setup");
> > > > >         }
> > > > >
> > > > > +       paging_init();
> > > > > +
> > > > >  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
> > > > >         if (m68k_ramdisk.size) {
> > > > >                 memblock_reserve(m68k_ramdisk.addr, m68k_ramdisk.size);
> > > >
> > > > Presumably something in memblock_reserve() relies on having
> > > > called paging_init() before?
> >
> > memblock_reserve() does not rely on paging_init() as it operates on
> > physical addresses and it does not care if memory was already registered.
> >
> > What does rely on paging_init() it's phys_to_virt() in the line after
> > memblock_reserve():
> >
> >                 initrd_start = (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(m68k_ramdisk.addr);
> >                 initrd_end = initrd_start + m68k_ramdisk.size;
> >
> > So to have both memtest and initrd we'd need something like
> >
> >         memblock_reserve(m68k_ramdisk.addr, m68k_ramdisk.size);
> >
> >         paging_init() {
> >                 /* setup page tables and memblock */
> >                 early_memtest();
> >         }
> >
> >         initrd_start = (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(m68k_ramdisk.addr);
> >
> > or
> >
> >         paging_init(); /* without early_memtest() */
> >
> >         memblock_reserve(m68k_ramdisk.addr, m68k_ramdisk.size);
> >         initrd_start = (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(m68k_ramdisk.addr);
> >
> >         early_memtest();
> 
> Of course... /me bangs his head against the TFT for not having
> realized before the values saved into initrd_{start,end} are not just
> for printing in the pr_info() line...

Happens to the best of us :)
 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> -- 
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.