Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 11:36 AM James Le Cuirot
<chewi-Yn+4UywRBy5n8C+U7lyxXlpr/1R2p/[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-08-27 at 10:46 +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> > Moreover, why is it that only a few developers have a problem with making
> > explicit their decisions regarding alignment of shorts? What actual pain
> > does it cause them to accept a patch to make their struct layouts plain?
>
> Some projects do accept patches. Yann Collet was even kind enough to fix this
> in zstd themselves. On the other hand, we have had to fight to stop Python
> from dropping m68k support entirely. The real problem is the effort required
> to produce these patches. I haven't been able to wrap my head around this so
> far, but I would still like to learn. I could see myself eventually fixing
> mold, but LLVM feels like a very tall order.

Perhaps we need a new compiler warning: "hole in structure due to
non-natural alignment, please consider adding explicit padding"?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds