Re: Bug#1068873: openjdk-21: more m68k patches

Dixi quod…

>>I’ll recompile with re-enabled alignment on the missing base
>
>Seems to be only one.
>
>--- src/hotspot/share/memory/allocation.hpp~	2024-04-12 23:52:54.000000000 +0000
>+++ src/hotspot/share/memory/allocation.hpp	2024-04-12 23:52:56.000000000 +0000
>@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ class CHeapObj {
>   void operator delete [] (void* p) {
>     CHeapObjBase::operator delete[](p);
>   }
>-};
>+} __attribute__ ((aligned (4)));
> 
> // Base class for objects allocated on the stack only.
> // Calling new or delete will result in fatal error.
>
>>classes like we have in 17. But if someone has ideas ’til then…
>
Yes, with this, the build gets much further, so I’d be glad if you
could include this in the next -21 upload (and -20 if you do any
more of these, but probably not, and not necessary on my account).

Thanks,
//mirabilos
-- 
Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich*
schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide
Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz
hervorragend.		-- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r