Re: Plan needed for switching m68k to 32-bit alignment

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k,gmane.linux.ports.m68k
Message-ID <8ca13b4b1a3c2d8d2e6d99c29b901659bb4108e1.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:57 +1300, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Arnd,
> 
> On 25/10/24 22:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I also expect that a lot of users (of m68k kernels) are
> > never going to get the benefits as they are already stuck on
> > older userspace because of added bloat in new software
> > releases. I assume you have better understanding than me
> > of what m68k hardware is commonly used these days, and
> > how constrained that is in practice.
> 
> I second that - currently bisecting to find out what makes my extremely 
> RAM constrained m68k system fail to boot or run anything past 6.9-rc4 
> (sysvinit, not systemd).

Should extremely RAM-constrained systems be the reference target for m68k?

> Much as I appreciate Adrian's efforts to keep up with user space 
> development, I won't be in a position to help with an ABI change.

Thanks, I will then just do it myself with brute force or drop the port.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.