Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.m68k,gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.user
Message-ID <0e8c9bdea72c4a0193ac59bdca6f850e2000259a.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
On Tue, 2025-05-20 at 12:09 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > What about kernel/userland compatibility?
> > 
> > What about it? This is about userland.
> 
> So you don't change the syscall/ioctl/... ABI?

I wasn't really planning on changing this. I just want to fix a longstanding
issue which has caused endless hours of wasted developer time to address them.

> > > > interested in new, "fancy" packages, just don't upgrade or install Debian
> > > > Etch or similar. Changing the default alignment does not affect existing
> > > > software.
> > > 
> > > What about existing software that is aware the minimum alignment is
> > > 2-bytes on m68k?
> > 
> > Can you name some cases? I would love to add these to my list.
> 
> Unfortunately not.
> Grepping for __mc68000__ may find some.

Well, we can just fix them on the go. If I see Debian packages FTBFS with 4 bytes
alignment, I can just fix them. So far I have not run into any package that did
not build with 4 bytes alignment but plenty that built with it.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.