Re: Bug#1127603: binutils: Please adjust ignore list for regressions on m68k

Hi,

On Tue, 2026-02-10 at 11:13 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Test results, compared with installed binutils:
> W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap
> W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with=
 -Wl,--traditional-format
> W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with=
 -Wl,--no-keep-memory
> W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with=
 -Wl,--relax
> W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with=
 -Wl,--max-cache-size=3D-1
> W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with=
 -Wl,-z,nosectionheader
> 6 REGRESSIONS (0.21%).
> 2829 tests: 2704 pass (95.58%), 28 fail (0.99%), 7 xfail (0.25%) 3 untest=
ed (0.11%).

Here are the test results for 2.46-1, seems to be the same:

Test results, compared with installed binutils:
W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap
W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with -=
Wl,--traditional-format
W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with -=
Wl,--no-keep-memory
W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with -=
Wl,--relax
W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with -=
Wl,--max-cache-size=3D-1
W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with -=
Wl,-z,nosectionheader
6 REGRESSIONS (0.21%)

Adrian

--=20
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913