Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

Hi!

On 12/14/22 21:44, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>> I'm attaching the second diff as a patch.
> 
> I think there's some whitespace difference. I manually applied the
> rejected stuff, made a `git diff` and comparing that to your attached
> patch gives:

Or just use the attached patch file from my previous mail.

If your glibc fails with Floating Point exception, I fear there might be
a second bug hiding somewhere which we need to bisect as well. This is
particularly annoying since we would have to apply the above diff for
every bisecting step.

But we'll see.

Adrian