Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports

Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Mar 2024 20:46:29 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.alpha
Message-ID <Pine.BSM.4.64L.2403112045110.7336__40506.2881343596$1710190456$gmane$org@herc.mirbsd.org>
Jérémy Lal dixit:

>While I'm very much concerned about architectures and compatibility,
>it seems that for python-cryptography, it's a sinking boat:
>The end of a very discussion dates from february, 2021 - 3 years ago:
>https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/5771#issuecomment-775990406

Ouch.

cbmuser also has hopes for rustc_codegen_gcc, but I believe that
quite a way off for regular use in Debian yet and won’t hold my
breath.

So, perhaps at least do palliative care for the 3.8-based package
in the meantime?

Porters can help, but we don’t know the python ecosystem well.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
Gast: „Ein Bier, bitte!“
Wirt: „Geht auch alkoholfrei?“
Gast: „Geht auch Spielgeld?“