Re: fdisk vs. BSD disklabels and slices

Bob Tracy <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.alpha,gmane.linux.ports.alpha
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 02:46:54PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 2:31 PM Bob Tracy <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone reading this used a recent version of "fdisk" to create a BSD
> > disklabel and disk slices from scratch on an Alpha?  If so, would you
> > please describe the procedure in enough detail that relevant Linux
> > installation documentation could be updated?  It would seem to be anything
> > *but* intuitive :-(.
> 
> fdisk's BSD disklabel support has been unusable raw disks, as far as I
> understand, since v2.23. See
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/util-linux-ng/msg11869.html
> 
> > If "fdisk" is the wrong utility, I need a pointer to the correct one(s).
> > At this point, I'm seriously considering digging out my old Debian 4.0
> > CDs and harvesting the essential pieces.
> >
> > As always, thanks in advance.
> 
> Use 'parted' instead. It works well. Reminds me that I need to change
> the Gentoo handbook to reference parted instead of fdisk.
> 
> > For what it's worth, the new Gentoo "install-alpha-minimal" image fixed
> > the "qla1280" firmware loading issue for the most part (a module reload
> > is required to get the firmware to load).
> 
> Good to hear. I suspect the module is in the initramfs but the
> firmware is on the root file system. Hmm..

Re: parted.  Thanks.  Presumably included in the i-a-m image: count on
me to say something if not :-).  Appreciate the steer.

--Bob
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.