Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-11-22

Bob Tracy <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.alpha
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:00:59PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> Did you build with latest toolchain?  I suspect the issue has
> appeared with toolchain changes (hard to pin down when because there
> was quite a period in which a new version of guile-2.0 was not
> uploaded).
> 
> And the bug (a segfault when texi documentation is built with the
> recently built guild executable) looks to be present elsewhere too
> (take a look at #941218 where comment #10 seen on Ubuntu looks 
> suspiciously like what we see on Alpha assuming it occurs at the
> same place).

I think I answered the toolchain question in my reply to Adrian's
earlier message.  There was an attached "packages" file with the complete
list of what I've got installed on the PWS.

> Unless built in clean chroot with only the build dependencies installed
> and with an up to date toolchain they won't be much use to us.

The toolchain is up-to-date, but I don't have the infrastructure to
support a clean chroot environment, even on another local system if I
were to try and use a cross-compiler vs. a native build.  In reference
to the build dependencies, if particular versions aren't specified, or
are only loosely specified (e.g., >= some value), are the dependencies
considered "best" satisfied with a stable package version meeting the
requirement?  Or is the current unstable version of a dependency
preferred when building for "sid"?  Many variables to consider, I guess.

--Bob
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.