Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing (Status update)

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Here is a little status update on the mails we have received so far.
> First off, thanks to all the porters who have already replied!
> 
> So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures:
> 
>    hurd-i386
>    ia64
>    mips
>    mipsel
>    s390x
> 
> I have pinged some people and #d-hurd, so this will hopefully be amended
> soon.  Remember that the *deadline is 1st of October*.
> 
> In the list above, I excluded:
> 
>   amd64 and i386: requirement for porters is waived
>   s390: Being removed from testing during the Jessie cycle
>         (Agreement made during the Wheezy release cycle)
> 
> The following table shows the porters for each architecture in
> *unstable* that I have data on so far:
> 
> armel: Wookey (DD)
> armhf: Jeremiah Foster (!DD, but NM?), Wookey (DD)
> kfreebsd-amd64: Christoph Egger (DD), Axel Beckert (DD),
>    Petr Salinger (!DD), Robert Millan (DD)
> kfreebsd-i386: Christoph Egger (DD), Axel Beckert (DD),
>    Petr Salinger (!DD), Robert Millan (DD)
> powerpc: Geoff Levand (!DD), Roger Leigh (DD)
> sparc: Axel Beckert (DD), Rainer Herbst (!DD)
> 
> 
> If you are missing from this list above, then I have missed your email.
>  Please follow up to this mail with a message-ID (or resend it,
> whichever you prefer).

Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Sent September 4th.

-- 
Len Sorensen