RE: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing

Hi everyone,

I am part of the group of MIPS porters, and we missed to officially
respond to this email. Here is for the record:

  I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
  to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:

  For MIPS,MIPSEL,MIPS64,MIPS64EL, I
  - can test all packages on this architecture on different hardware
    (I have access to different MIPS boards)
  - detect toolchain issues and bring it to the attention of toolchain
    maintainers whom we already have contact to,
  - triage arch-specific bugs, see we which issues are MIPS specific
  - fix arch-related bugs
  - maintain build

  In the last three years, I was a MIPS porter of MIPS32 LE and BE, and
  MIPS64 LE and BE.

I am not a DD/DM.


Jurica Stanojkovic

________________________________________
From: Dejan Latinovic
Sent: 01 November 2013 11:17
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Dragoslav Sicarov; Jurica Stanojkovic; Petar Jovanovic
Subject: Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing

Hi everyone,

I am part of the group of MIPS porters, and we missed to officially
respond to this email. Here is for the record:

  I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
  to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:

  For MIPS,MIPSEL,MIPS64,MIPS64EL, I
  - can test all packages on this architecture on different hardware
   (I have access to different MIPS boards)
  - detect toolchain issues and bring it to the attention of toolchain
    maintainers whom we already have contact to,
  - triage arch-specific bugs, see we which issues are MIPS specific
  - fix arch-related bugs
  - maintain build

  In the last three years, I was a MIPS porter of MIPS32 LE and BE, and
  MIPS64 LE and BE.

  Dejan Latinovic



On 09/01/2013 09:33 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of
> that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which
> port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an
> overview of which of the porters are (still) active for each
> port. Once the results from the role-call are in, we will request
> other information about the status of the ports. In the meantime, feel
> free to update and collect info about the ports in the Debian wiki[WIKI].
>
> If you are (or intend to become) an active porter for the lifetime of
> jessie, then please send a signed email explaining your involvement in
> the port to the Release Team <[email protected]> before
> 1st of October 2013. Please explain the level of your involvement in
> the port.
>
> Feel free to use the following template as your reply:
>
> """
>   Hi,
>
>   I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
>   to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
>
>   For <ARCH>, I
>   - test (most|all) packages on this architecture
>   - fix toolchain issues
>   - triage arch-specific bugs
>   - fix arch-related bugs
>   - maintain buildds
>   - ...
>
>   <I am a DD|I am a DM|I am not a DD/DM>
>
>   <YOUR NAME>
> """
>
> Niels, on behalf of the release team
>
> [LAST-BITS] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/08/msg00006.html
>
> [WIKI] https://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/Jessie
>
>
>