Re: Potential issues for most ports

On 2013-11-03 16:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-11-03 15:49, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> > Niels Thykier dixit:
>> > 
>>> >> [...]
>>> >> Until we have a clear definition of "actively maintained ports", I would
>>> >> recommend porters to err on the side of being verbose over being silent.
>> > 
>> > I’ve held off on the m68k side because I think the role call was only
>> > for architectures in the main archive, right?
>> > 
> Yes, we are only talking about architectures in the main architecture.
> 

s/main arcihtecture/main archive/;

~Niels



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]