Re: maintainer communication (was Re: Debian kernel regression, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III)

Finn Thain <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64
Message-ID <alpine.LNX.2.00.1312232231090.18343__9946.25934768028$1387799451$gmane$org@nippy.intranet> 
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:

> > CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y and CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG=n

Why is CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG to be disabled? And why was 
CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK disabled?

> I think we need to file bugs in the BTS for each of these instances in 
> the future, instead of trying to communicate with the maintainers 
> directly.

Sure, if the BTS process would help avoid these mistakes. But I don't see 
how it can help when it is downstream of the kernel developers.

Finn
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.