Re: gnutls28 transition

"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64
Organization Debian - The Universal OS
Message-ID <2156746.eBzsy0u8Yc__12048.2949227609$1399198316$gmane$org@gyllingar>
Le dimanche, 4 mai 2014, 02.14:17 peter green a écrit :
> Personally I'd add a (build-)depends on the relicensed gmp in the next
> gnutls28 upload. That way packages can (build-)depend on the new
> gnutls and be assured of getting a GPLv2 compatible version.

For cups, as it doesn't build-depend on libgmp directly, I added the 
inverse relationship:

# libgmp-dev is not GPL-2 compatible before it's 6 release, which makes
# it also GPL-2+
Build-Conflicts: libgmp-dev (<< 2:6)

Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Should we start transition to gnutls28 by default, for all packages
> that are compatible?

Yes, please.

Cheers,
OdyX
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.