Re: OT: complaints about systemd

Michael <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At this point, think about architectures. (Thanks heaven we're a little more on topic now ;)

Especially Debian tries to support many architectures, at least as good as resources provide.

Lennarts Operating System Troll (LOST) resulting in DLL (Distributor-Less Linux) woul probably remove support for the minor archs. The 'linux app' market places replacing Distributors won't take responsibility for such a difficult time-consuming task, and the developers themselves certainly won't do it either. I can't see any solution to this problem. The diversity of archs may simply vanish, in last consequence.

Well, Poettering probably sees this as as a pro.

Along the existing distribution framework, a great deal of community will vanish too. 

But distributions are a place where concerned people meet and talk, and work collaboratively. It's also a good starting point for developer newcomers. And IMHO those 'superfluous' meetings about questions of whom to support, where to go, or ideals and ideas like freedom in general, are a core part of the whole thing.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.