Re: complaints about systemd
Ray Andrews <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/17/2014 02:38 PM, Christopher Browne wrote: > On 9 October 2014 19:49, Lennart Sorensen > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:25:23AM -0700, Ray Andrews wrote: > > Can *anything* justify creating a problem that can't be debugged? > > I noticed on a reboot yesterday that there was a 5 minute countdown > shutting down samba by the looks of it. Seems to be bug #762002. > > > I suppose that this invalidates one of the functionality claims that > was part > of the basis for adoption... > > Specifically... > > https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd Well, they certainly write a glowing review of themselves, do they not? That's a very well written and convincing doc, but it does seem that not enough attention has been paid to the issues that have been raised here. On my system I get strange messages about 'start jobs' and 'stop jobs' which come with one minute, thirty second countdowns. I don't know why it has to be 90 seconds, would 60 seconds not do the trick? 30 seconds just totally wrong? Still, the big question is: are these fixable glitches and bugs, or do they point to those deeper, fundamental problems that we've talked about? But, to be devil's advocate: One thing about the systemd doc above that struck me as a sound argument was that starting a service is ... starting a service, and that whereas that mostly happens at init, it makes sense that whatever code/method is used to do it at init may as well be used generally. No?