Re: Xfce vs GNOME
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEv0nmtDWc=GX7-wyChGgWUfjTV9q2E4NjhtduyRAOT3Hu9dOw@mail.gmail.com> |
I apologize for the mistake. francesco pietra On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Tomasz Kundera <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, GNOME is not the father of XFCE in any means. > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> With testing amd64 I installed Xfce a few months ago. I can now say >> that, for scientific use of the computer, I found Xfce far better than its >> father, GNOME. First, Xfce does not take possession of the computer. >> Second, I can run preliminary molecular dynamics with CPU-graphical boards >> from Xfce. That was not possible from GNOME, which took a lot of RAM and, >> worse, gradually eated up all RAM. With GNOME I had to run MD without the >> X-server, a slower doing in trial MD, to prepare the system for the >> mainframe. >> >> I only have to check whether gchempaint (a drawing tool for small >> molecules) works with Xfce. That is needed. >> >> regards >> >> francesco pietra >> > > > > -- > Tomasz Kundera >