Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Niels Thykier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5f4474be-626c-7e11-e1ef-afd69270d3d5__48535.6656871319$1465846536$gmane$org@thykier.net> |
Philipp Kern: > On 2016-06-05 12:01, Niels Thykier wrote: >> * amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, >> s390x >> - *No* blockers at this time from RT, DSA nor security. >> - s390, ppc64el and all arm ports have DSA concerns. > > What is the current DSA concern about s390x? > > Kind regards and thanks > Philipp Kern > The concern listed as: "rely on sponsors for hardware (mild concern)" As I recall the argument went something along the lines of: "Debian cannot replace the hardware; if any of the machines dies, we need a sponsor to replace it. If all of them dies and we cannot get sponsored replacements, we cannot support the architecture any longer" (My wording) Thanks, ~Niels
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 801 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXXwqkAAoJEAVLu599gGRC1VwP/j5wsTAdLqnegb8Re8DXkaR4 0uimNlWBLQewClBOXXaNJ0HOFKJ/hwKYohrdJAieDE4XEFpmgGnQ1zbvvxsPfPoI HNQIwktdxR+NlHRpVn0YF8v+75gVe2hnwxviy9sgMckHxqcn+s9q8BHpG+MHDbo5 TUCQg57KBNhKyEN9jbRmAiZaBw7TTWyzFq0ou1NkSEjncT8vSLD71NDTqEKGe7Rt hI6ho3EjnBVzpOuYiMft7Xvp7pVScEziTCGeaNSUCEc2nsTsc/5wleTGhmreWukM 9vM49OGyjpqaXWRiynwVeXbNrGsjh+AKv+351Jz2RT6N1eIz9lB9M7pUHMNo2clk gloGSwTn4DAsFJvw2Y4CoF5HE3TJYWQpLAYMNCVaazEwvnxa7jq/C04JDGFtzuYP Yc8sWAocd/Gw7JIKIAJL+A8b34bP2g5d2ZNJOiMwjLhW+sPCepE83VxGGHzt2cxI 7Pz8Zg35v4pS7A4uMY9k3QSTYEhp51tj1wJXhQyQQXpl082BW1GZKph+R3jy2axj fEzmbi/asYXeoLBI3mzJEMK661MszqfVO+TPmew92G63lNDENXeA0B3ELMHBD4gG BQpvrR+3py4Nf12gyFDrdsFeROhms9mtScIdO6XAzV9WpzS8d59vXuCRYaqcJHuD +3fMkcs4Gv62XUhJquMA =nb4G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----