Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Jérémy Lal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJxTCxwDQrrQkd8=A3Xnf9NXvkreBePK+TTGauaQaqzDPi2a2A__41450.8192845219$1710191857$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
Le lun. 11 mars 2024 à 21:53, Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> a écrit : > Jérémy Lal dixit: > > >While I'm very much concerned about architectures and compatibility, > >it seems that for python-cryptography, it's a sinking boat: > >The end of a very discussion dates from february, 2021 - 3 years ago: > >https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/5771#issuecomment-775990406 > > Ouch. > > cbmuser also has hopes for rustc_codegen_gcc, but I believe that > quite a way off for regular use in Debian yet and won’t hold my > breath. > > So, perhaps at least do palliative care for the 3.8-based package > in the meantime? Porters can help, but we don’t know the python ecosystem well. Anyone had experience with the version 3.3 to 38.0 migration ? Maybe the API didn't change that much.