Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports

Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64
Message-ID <Pine.BSM.4.64L.2403140552220.10945__37694.4354896963$1710396348$gmane$org@herc.mirbsd.org>
Dixi quod…

>Is there a chance your team could fork the old python-cryptography
>source package (3.4.8-2) and do something like:

Apparently, pyopenssl needs to also be forked as it wraps the above
and, between 21.0.0-1 and 22.1.0-1, it began requiring the rust
version of python-cryptography ☹

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
<igli> exceptions: a truly awful implementation of quite a nice idea.
<igli> just about the worst way you could do something like that, afaic.
<igli> it's like anti-design.  <mirabilos> that too… may I quote you on that?
<igli> sure, tho i doubt anyone will listen ;)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.