Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal

Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.hurd,gmane.linux.debian.ports.bsd,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2019-04-13 13:07, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 4/13/2019 12:49 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
> > deb, udeb and buildinfo files from the archives (main and debug) and
> > associate them with the .changes files that are hosted on coccia. We'll
> > also need to fetch all the associated GPG keys used to sign the changes
> > files. Then we can inject that in the debian-ports archive.
> I'm curious how the GPG bit works given that there is no guarantee that
> the signature can be validated at any other point in time than ingestion
> on ftp-master - especially considering the rotation/expiry of subkeys
> and buildd keys.

All the old buildd keys can be fetch from fasolo and can be used to
validate the signatures.

> In this case the files already come from a trusted
> source and should be ingested as-is, I guess? (Not that I particularly
> like the fact that it's only a point in time validation.)

Yes in that case, it's possible to resign the changes files, or let the
buildds to rebuild the corresponding packages.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.