Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal

On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 12:59 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2019-04-13 12:37, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Before even thinking about uploading the hurd-i386 and kfreebsd
> > unstable/experimental packages to debian-ports, is there enough
> > disk space for this on it?  It seems my DD account is not enabled
> > on ftp.ports.debian.org so I can't check myself.
> 
> Disk space should be fine to import hurd-i386. There might be enough
> space to also import kfreebsd-*, but only for the short term. As the
> number of packages in unstable is increasing regularly, we will need
> to get more disk space soon, probably before the buster release.
> Unfortunately the disk space on the ganeti cluster where the
> porta.d.o VM is hosted is also getting low.
> 
> The CPU and RAM is however probably to low to add the 3 ports, unless
> wereduce the number of archive-install run per day (currently running
> every 6 hours).

One problem with debian-ports is that the sources, most interesting the
*.debian.tar.* files. You cannot any longer add deb-src to the
sources.list and apt-get source <package>; dpkg-buildpackage ...

As I understand it the sources have to be added to where the binary
package are e.g. 
http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/pool-hurd-i386/main/g/gdb/ and
the way to build from source is dget 
http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/pool-hurd-i386/main/g/gdb/gdb_7.12-6.1+pie.dsc
etc.

Is there space in ftp.ports.debian.org also for the source packages?