Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for kfreebsd-any?

"Andrea Pappacoda" <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Sep 2025 10:34:07 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.bsd,gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Guillem,

On Wed Sep 3, 2025 at 4:42 AM CEST, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Was checking last year the status of several of the dpkg arch=20
> definitions, and whether they are in use and/or useful, and stumbled=20
> over the kfreebsd-any ones.
>
> The ports were dropped from Debian, and they never went back to Debian=20
> ports. The ports were declared dead, and there's been no further=20
> development that I'm aware of, and while that saddens me, I think it=20
> should be fine to remove their definitions from dpkg? (If the port=20
> ever grows interest again we could always re-add them! :)

Which kinds of operataing systems should be ideally kept? I also see=20
some definitions like kopensolaris in the ostable.

Bye!