Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for kfreebsd-any?
"Andrea Pappacoda" <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Sep 2025 10:34:07 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.bsd,gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Guillem, On Wed Sep 3, 2025 at 4:42 AM CEST, Guillem Jover wrote: > Was checking last year the status of several of the dpkg arch=20 > definitions, and whether they are in use and/or useful, and stumbled=20 > over the kfreebsd-any ones. > > The ports were dropped from Debian, and they never went back to Debian=20 > ports. The ports were declared dead, and there's been no further=20 > development that I'm aware of, and while that saddens me, I think it=20 > should be fine to remove their definitions from dpkg? (If the port=20 > ever grows interest again we could always re-add them! :) Which kinds of operataing systems should be ideally kept? I also see=20 some definitions like kopensolaris in the ostable. Bye!