Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:30:57 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.bsd
Message-ID <c0e7d70991b649a64280eee8e76cd1e6cfe2c042.camel__43415.2049406961$1761643914$gmane$org@physik.fu-berlin.de>
On Tue, 2025-10-28 at 10:07 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 09:59:11AM +0100, Romain Dolbeau wrote:
> > Debian isn't Microsoft. Debian isn't Apple. Debian isn't Google.
> > Please don't learn the wrong lessons from them. Planned obsolescence
> > is bad, not good.
>=20
> Still, Debian has to rely on stable support in kernel and toolchain. =20
> Once kernel and toolchain stop supporting=C2=B9 an architecture there is=
=20
> nothing that Debian could do about that with its limited personpower and=
=20
> resources.

POWER8 is still years away from being removed from the kernel and toolchain=
.

I don't think that anyone at IBM is seriously considering dropping POWER8
support in the kernel or even the toolchain at the moment.

I mean, POWER5 was first announced in 2003 and is still supported by the
Linux kernel and toolchain, so I'm very sure that POWER8 is not going to
go anywhere soon.

Adrian

--=20
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913