Re: git: test suite fails on hppa, in run_with_limited_stack

John David Anglin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.hppa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2020-05-15 11:52 p.m., Greg Price wrote:
> Still I'm not sure that that situation is helped by putting the `uname
> -m` inside this case. This is the catchall `*)` case after looking
> only for MINGW, CYGWIN, and FreeBSD, and those all appear to have
> pretty sane `uname -m` behavior. (On FreeBSD, `uname -p` gets a bit
> more specific but `uname -m` is already sane; I found the report here:
>   https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/5766
> informative.) If any of the OSes where config.guess has to do more
> work were to get this far in building and testing Git, they'd end up
> running any code we stick at this spot anyway. So I think it still
> makes more sense to put the new `case` next to the existing one.
>
> One other thought I have from that config.guess example, though --
> there are some cases there like this:
>
>     parisc64:Linux:*:* | hppa64:Linux:*:*)
>         echo hppa64-unknown-linux-"$LIBC"
>         exit ;;
>
> That suggests to me that the condition should perhaps look for "hppa", too, like
>
> parisc* | hppa*)
>     test_set_prereq HPPA
>     ;;
>
> What do you think?
I think that's fine.

Because git is important, Helge and I have been building it manually and largely ignoring test failures.  This
will help distinguish architectural limitations from new bugs.

Regards,
Dave
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.