Re: Bug#972510: (no subject)

John David Anglin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.hppa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi!

misc/tst-sbrk-pie fails on hppa.  Haven't seen misc/tst-sbrk fail on hppa.

We also need to xfail nptl/tst-cond24 on hppa.  It fails randomly.

Thanks,
Dave

On 2020-10-19 12:05 p.m., John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Source: glibc
> Version: 2.31-4
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: alpha hppa ia64 m68k sh4 sparc64
>
> Hello!
>
> The two tests:
>
> FAIL: misc/tst-sbrk
> FAIL: misc/tst-sbrk-pie
>
> fail on multiple architectures.
>
> According to the discussion in #debian-ports, the tests are broken and not really necessary anyway:
>
>   jrtc27 | misc/tst-sbrk and/or misc/tst-sbrk-pie seem to be failing on a *lot* of architectures
>   jrtc27 | if it were up to me the problem would be solved by just deleting sbrk...
>   jrtc27 | FreeBSD just took the stance of not implementing them for new ports
>   jrtc27 | so it's arm64 and riscv64 ports just have no sbrk
>   jrtc27 | cbmuser: looks like the tests are Debian-specific
>   jrtc27 | added as part of Hurd sbrk reworking to test it didn't break
>
> Can we disable them? With the tests disabled, glibc should pass its testsuite on at least alpha and
> sparc64. Not sure what the problem with hppa is at the moment.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> --
>  .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> : :' :  Debian Developer - [email protected]
> `. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - [email protected]
>   `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.