Re: Qt 6 on X32 and HPPA ports: upstream requiring proof of usage
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.kde.talk,gmane.linux.debian.ports.hppa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4466085.LvFx2qVVIh@gryffindor> |
El jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 15:08:49 -03 Sam James escribió: [snip] > > Pruning whatever code they do not test on the CI and does not has active > > users, no matter how short/long it can be. > > At > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qbs/qbs/+/437296/comments/9b34cbab_87ce > d2e4, someone suggested adding cross HPPA (and maybe others) to their Docker > setup. That could be a start. I'm quite in contact with the CI staff. I sincerely don't think they will want to add yet another CI image except they have a big client requiring it :-/ I'll bring it up next week, but I will not have high expectations on this. -- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEEt36hKwjsrvwSzE8q2RfQGKGp9AFAmPb/z4ACgkQq2RfQGKG p9Bg2g//amJMHWHiI2yZ1KzOTPINimshPfnECRrlDfMZsA13P8Q3zkWKzt5Z6aCP 4uf3rFTYgOfV55vKIKCK/f4x6bkTS+CrFmg2RatE9i6Mx7gN/bT+hoGGAGNLB3TV skZykt30T0Rn/ZPRcFRtdoC1ULliZCUpB2r4tB7wLiSd4tzm2YLjP7l4FWLg3ikD +OOTtDRuSC7eHTTJOFFk7voG52hiYPSfkcP/iA6P9MEwLQlN5VNamSu1wdGS80vS +DcsVDR1PQtjQ6Y3Il9cUSCmr7ZziN3i3wF+XHsBg5xSj7M025P5HxHuHN4sd6jV YQfB4wYHKXF3QF2QmC4KBv1wVYpm8C0lL9364woSWeK/dodrit/b+Tcn2XV661rM lczr9yut6N1UG5RiWWSe01XJSKQLFRcR3LMOUWa0YtrfMa/JbehoCh4NWnrxJSNj h/XugxF/tRwteiDdqNh9tJ08WsGdpLcrgkJvj1QwQ4pynK7UaTGHsj+adIUyTzO1 zWa1q/TzfjiBLA/yD8gnFK4RvKsqsEKZy4u/BGhFHE0tXvYmI2k6Mf9+AeTnQd24 /jGHffL2j8USzLQheGd4E6vIN0PMyv1LYWbxaytm6N6VPLo8pjnWvEIBivVtzun+ DxgCngvQfdj7cH0R+OphZt2lr301aKhPOuRS3WgJRQcliWIGbMg= =k3z2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----