Re: vm_object shadow pages and task termination

Michael Kelly, le dim. 08 juin 2025 08:35:02 +0100, a ecrit:
> On 07/06/2025 21:47, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > There is one thing, however: I see in some places going through shadows
> > that they lock the next object before unlocking the previous. This
> > indeed seems safer against object->shadow changing under our feet.
> That is my mistake and you are correct. See the revised patch at the end of
> this message which addresses that. I've kept the code in the same style as
> the existing code of vm_object.c (ie. use of while(1)/break).

I have fixed it and applied it, thanks!

Samuel