Re: [PATCH] ia64: Ensure proper NUMA distance and possible map initialization
Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ia64,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.debian.ports.ia64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 13:06:17 +0000 Valentin Schneider <[email protected]> wrote: > John Paul reported a warning about bogus NUMA distance values spurred by > commit: > > 620a6dc40754 ("sched/topology: Make sched_init_numa() use a set for the deduplicating sort") > > In this case, the afflicted machine comes up with a reported 256 possible > nodes, all of which are 0 distance away from one another. This was > previously silently ignored, but is now caught by the aforementioned > commit. > > The culprit is ia64's node_possible_map which remains unchanged from its > initialization value of NODE_MASK_ALL. In John's case, the machine doesn't > have any SRAT nor SLIT table, but AIUI the possible map remains untouched > regardless of what ACPI tables end up being parsed. Thus, !online && > possible nodes remain with a bogus distance of 0 (distances \in [0, 9] are > "reserved and have no meaning" as per the ACPI spec). > > Follow x86 / drivers/base/arch_numa's example and set the possible map to > the parsed map, which in this case seems to be the online map. > > Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > Fixes: 620a6dc40754 ("sched/topology: Make sched_init_numa() use a set for the deduplicating sort") > Reported-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]> > --- > This might need an earlier Fixes: tag, but all of this is quite old and > dusty (the git blame rabbit hole leads me to ~2008/2007) > Thanks. Is this worth a cc:stable tag?