Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Mar 2024 20:46:29 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.ia64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.BSM.4.64L.2403112045110.7336__36987.3126548313$1710190449$gmane$org@herc.mirbsd.org> |
J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my Lal dixit: >While I'm very much concerned about architectures and compatibility, >it seems that for python-cryptography, it's a sinking boat: >The end of a very discussion dates from february, 2021 - 3 years ago: >https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/5771#issuecomment-775990406 Ouch. cbmuser also has hopes for rustc_codegen_gcc, but I believe that quite a way off for regular use in Debian yet and won=E2=80=99t hold my breath. So, perhaps at least do palliative care for the 3.8-based package in the meantime? Porters can help, but we don=E2=80=99t know the python ecosystem well. bye, //mirabilos --=20 Gast: =E2=80=9EEin Bier, bitte!=E2=80=9C Wirt: =E2=80=9EGeht auch alkoholfrei?=E2=80=9C Gast: =E2=80=9EGeht auch Spielgeld?=E2=80=9C