Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Mar 2024 05:53:28 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.ia64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.BSM.4.64L.2403140552220.10945__9874.84787344641$1710396370$gmane$org@herc.mirbsd.org> |
Dixi quod=E2=80=A6 >Is there a chance your team could fork the old python-cryptography >source package (3.4.8-2) and do something like: Apparently, pyopenssl needs to also be forked as it wraps the above and, between 21.0.0-1 and 22.1.0-1, it began requiring the rust version of python-cryptography =E2=98=B9 bye, //mirabilos --=20 <igli> exceptions: a truly awful implementation of quite a nice idea. <igli> just about the worst way you could do something like that, afaic. <igli> it's like anti-design. <mirabilos> that too=E2=80=A6 may I quote yo= u on that? <igli> sure, tho i doubt anyone will listen ;)