Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports

Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Mar 2024 05:53:28 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.ia64
Message-ID <Pine.BSM.4.64L.2403140552220.10945__9874.84787344641$1710396370$gmane$org@herc.mirbsd.org>
Dixi quod=E2=80=A6

>Is there a chance your team could fork the old python-cryptography
>source package (3.4.8-2) and do something like:

Apparently, pyopenssl needs to also be forked as it wraps the above
and, between 21.0.0-1 and 22.1.0-1, it began requiring the rust
version of python-cryptography =E2=98=B9

bye,
//mirabilos
--=20
<igli> exceptions: a truly awful implementation of quite a nice idea.
<igli> just about the worst way you could do something like that, afaic.
<igli> it's like anti-design.  <mirabilos> that too=E2=80=A6 may I quote yo=
u on that?
<igli> sure, tho i doubt anyone will listen ;)