AW: Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:35:00 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.ia64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1110630928.1522692.1761644100970__4070.39418803237$1761645114$gmane$org@mail.yahoo.com> |
------=_Part_1522691_134984513.1761644100969 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It's a really good point though about x86-64-v1. There are still thousands = of Core2Duo systems out there. Anything pre-Nehalem just isn't x86-64-v2 co= mpliant. These systems basically flooded the used marked and are an entry point to l= ow-cost computing for many. It's hard to justify locking out these users be= fore support is dropped in the mainline Kernel. It's only RHEL that's really pushing for it AFAIK. From their perspective i= t's reasonable, because of the the marginal performance gains that would be= nefit their customers. For anyone else it just isn't. Cheers, JD =20 =20 Am Di., Okt. 28, 2025 at 10:32 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz<glaubitz= @physik.fu-berlin.de>: On Tue, 2025-10-28 at 09:59 +0100, Romain Dolbeau = wrote: > Le lun. 27 oct. 2025 =C3=A0 22:58, Milan Kupcevic <[email protected]> a = =C3=A9crit : > > It would be more reasonable to count 7 years since mass sales or wide > > availability ends as hardware typically lasts 5 to 7 years in productio= n > > environment. >=20 > Hardware lasts a lot longer. People are forced to update because > vendors have given up on support and are forcing users to upgrade. > It's called planned obsolescence, as I'm sure you all already know. There is no such thing is planned obsolescence. Code has to be maintained a= nd that costs money. You cannot force any vendor to support old hardware forev= er. You can still pay them to get support for ancient hardware in most cases th= ough. Adrian --=20 .''`.=C2=A0 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' :=C2=A0 Debian Developer `. `'=C2=A0 Physicist =C2=A0 `-=C2=A0 =C2=A0 GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546=C2=A0 0006 7426 3B37 F= 5B5 F913 =20 ------=_Part_1522691_134984513.1761644100969 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It's a really good point though about x86-64-v1. There are still thousands = of Core2Duo systems out there. Anything pre-Nehalem just isn't x86-64-v2 co= mpliant.<div><br></div><div>These systems basically flooded the used marked= and are an entry point to low-cost computing for many. It's hard to justif= y locking out these users before support is dropped in the mainline Kernel.= </div><div><br></div><div>It's only RHEL that's really pushing for it AFAIK= . From their perspective it's reasonable, because of the the marginal perfo= rmance gains that would benefit their customers. For anyone else it just is= n't.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers, JD<br> <br> <blockquote style=3D"marg= in: 0 0 20px 0;"> <div style=3D"font-family:Roboto, sans-serif; color:#6D00= F6;"> <div>Am Di., Okt. 28, 2025 at 10:32 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz= </div><div><[email protected]>:</div> </div> <div style=3D= "padding: 10px 0 0 20px; margin: 10px 0 0 0; border-left: 1px solid #6D00F6= ;"> On Tue, 2025-10-28 at 09:59 +0100, Romain Dolbeau wrote:<div class=3D"y= qt8366513807" id=3D"yqtfd35172"><br clear=3D"none">> Le lun. 27 oct. 202= 5 =C3=A0 22:58, Milan Kupcevic <<a shape=3D"rect" ymailto=3D"mailto:mila= [email protected]" href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>> a = =C3=A9crit :<br clear=3D"none">> > It would be more reasonable to cou= nt 7 years since mass sales or wide<br clear=3D"none">> > availabilit= y ends as hardware typically lasts 5 to 7 years in production<br clear=3D"n= one">> > environment.<br clear=3D"none">> <br clear=3D"none">> = Hardware lasts a lot longer. People are forced to update because<br clear= =3D"none">> vendors have given up on support and are forcing users to up= grade.<br clear=3D"none">> It's called planned obsolescence, as I'm sure= you all already know.</div><br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none">There is = no such thing is planned obsolescence. Code has to be maintained and<br cle= ar=3D"none">that costs money. You cannot force any vendor to support old ha= rdware forever.<br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none">You can still pay them= to get support for ancient hardware in most cases though.<br clear=3D"none= "><br clear=3D"none">Adrian<br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none">-- <br cle= ar=3D"none"> .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz<br clear=3D"none">: :' := Debian Developer<br clear=3D"none">`. `' Physicist<br clear= =3D"none"> `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7= 426 3B37 F5B5 F913<div class=3D"yqt8366513807" id=3D"yqtfd84744"><br clear= =3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"></div> </div> </blockquote></div> ------=_Part_1522691_134984513.1761644100969--